Obviously there are ways around the chip both refilling the first party tanks and placing the chip on a third party tank are being implemented. A friend with a different manufacture of photo printer had their head go bad within a year using only first party inks. The print head clogged after around three years, and I replaced it. That's literally one third of the price of an OEM tank and very similar quality. Using $4 a pop third party ink tanks, I couldn't notice a difference between an identical print from the included canon tanks. My counter argument is that I owned a canon s900 once upon a time. There is an argument to be made that OEM ink tanks will never suffer from quality issues. "Use third party inks and your printer will explode and injure you! Print quality will suffer if you don't use our ink that costs one hundred times more than the similar volume of gasoline! Only we (canon/epson/whoever) are able to formulate inks that don't immediately set fire to your prints!" I don't know about you, but I don't exactly buy into the printer manufacturer's scare tactics when it comes to third party inks.
#Canon printer rip off scam series
Let this be a warning to all of you who are in the market for a photo printer some of the higher end canon ip series printers use tanks with microchips.
0 kommentar(er)
